An answer from the Director of the Royal Observatory at Greenwich

Back in 1999, one of the big networks (who shall remain nameless, because they don't deserve any credit here) hosted an online chat with Kristen Lippincott, Director of the Greenwich Observatory, due to their prominence in the (false) millennium celebrations. Here's the question I asked her and her answer:

David Topping at 11:57am ET
Why are people celebrating one year too soon? According to your Web site of the Royal Greenwich Observatory, the third Millennium doesn't begin until 2001. This isn't just "technically correct"—it's simply the way our calendar system works, so what's wrong with everyone?

Kristen Lippincott at 11:58am ET
People have a fascination with numbers. It is the same sort of thing as kids getting excited when the odometer in your car goes from 999 to 000. The reason that the new millennium starts in 2001 is because when the calender was developed in the 6th century, they began AD with the year 1. So the new millennium doesn't begin until 2000 years after that or 2001.

What we are doing at the Royal Observatory is getting around this by saying that we are celebrating the beginning of the 'Millennium Year'.

[back to the True Millennium page]